Cadernos de Atenção Básica nº 19
Envelhecimento e Saúde da Pessoa Idosa. Ministério da Saúde. Referência usada para comunicação, avaliação multidimensional, funcionalidade, rede de apoio e Projeto Terapêutico Singular.
Pessoa Idosa
Bibliografias
Fontes oficiais e referências extraídas dos cards de avaliação. As duas fontes estruturantes do módulo aparecem primeiro, seguidas das referências por domínio clínico.
Fontes e curadoria
Base bibliográfica do módulo Pessoa Idosa
Esta página reúne as fontes principais da avaliação inicial na APS e as referências já existentes nos cards das ferramentas. Referências marcadas como pendentes devem ser revisadas antes da publicação clínica final.
Guia de Cuidados para a Pessoa Idosa
Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde, Departamento de Gestão do Cuidado Integral. Brasília, DF, 2023. Referência para qualificação do cuidado integral na APS.
Cards de ferramentas
Referências por domínio
Use os blocos abaixo para consultar as referências relacionadas a cada instrumento de avaliação.
Ansiedade 2 avaliaçãoões
GAD-7
Altunoz U, Kokurcan A, Kirici S, Bastug G, Ozel-Kizil ET Clinical characteristics of generalized anxiety: older vs. young adults Nord J Psychiatr 2018; 72(2):97-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2017.1390607 Delamain H, Buckman JEJ, Stott J, John A, Singh A, Singh S, et al Measurement invariance and differential item functioning of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 between working age adults seeking treatment for common mental disorders J Affect Disord 2024; 347:15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.11.048 Gonçalves A, Zuanazzi AC, Salvador A, Jaloto A Evidências de validade para Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Rev Psicol Saúd. 2023;15(1). https://doi.org/10.20435/pssa.v15i1.1743 Moreno AL, DeSousa DA, Souza AMFLP, Manfro GG, Salum GA, Koller SH, et al Factor structure, reliability, and item parameters of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the GAD-7 questionnaire
GAI
Martiny C, Silva ACO, Nardi AE, Pachana NA Tradução e adaptação transcultural da versão brasileira do Inventário de Ansiedade Geriátrica (GAI) Rev Psiq Clin 2011; 38(1): 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832011000100003 Massena PN, Araújo NB, Pachana N, Laks J, Pádua AC Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of Geriatric Anxiety Inventory – GAI-BR Int Psychogeriatr 2015; 27(7): 1113-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610214001021 Pachana NA, Byrne GJ, Siddle H, Koloski N, Harley E, Arnold E Development and validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory Int Psychogeriatr 2007; 19(1): 103-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610206003504.
Cardiogeriatria 4 avaliaçãoões
CHA2DS2-VA
Boriani G, Vitolo M, Mei DA CHA2DS2-VA instead of CHA2DS2-VASc for stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation: not just a matter of sex Europace 2024; 26(11): euae281. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae281 Champsi A, Mobley AR, Subramanian A, Nirantharakumar K, Wang X, Shukla D, et al Gender and contemporary risk of adverse events in atrial fibrillation Eur Heart J 2024;45(36):3707-3717. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae539 Choi SY, Kim MH, Kim HB, Kang SY, Lee KM, Hyun K, et al Validation of the CHA2DS2-VA Score (Excluding Female Sex) in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Study J Clin Med 2023; 12(21): 6770. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216770 Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, et al
CHARGE-AF
Alonso A, Krijthe BP, Aspelund T, Stepas KA, Pencina MJ, et al Simple risk model predicts incidence of atrial fibrillation in a racially and geographically diverse population: the CHARGE-AF consortium J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2(2):e000102. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.000102 Goudis C, Daios S, Dimitriadis F, Liu T CHARGE-AF: A useful score for atrial fibrillation prediction? Curr Cardiol Rev 2023; 19(2): e010922208402. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X1866622901102557 Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, Benjamin EJ, Chyou JY, Cronin EM, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practices Guidelines J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83(1): 109-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.017 Khurshid S, Kartoun U, Ashburner JM, Trinquart L, Philippakis A, Khera PT et al Performance of Atrial Fibrillation Risk Prediction Models in Over 4 Million Individuals Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2021; 14(1): e008997. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008997
H2FPEF
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
HAS-BLED
Chang G, Xie Q, Ma L, Hu K, Zhang Z, Mu G, et al Accuracy of HAS-BLED and other bleeding risk assessment tools in predicting major bleeding events in atrial fibrillation: A network meta-analysis J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18(4): 791-801. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14692 Chichareon P, Winijkul A, Lip GYH, Krittayaphong R Comparative validation of HAS-BLED, GARFIELD-AF and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in Asian people with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulation: A report from the COOL-AF registry Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89(8): 2472-2482. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15716 Gao X, Cai X, Yang Y, Zhou Y, Zhu W Diagnostic Accuracy of the HAS-BLED Bleeding Score in VKA- or DOAC-Treated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8: 757087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.757087 Lip GYH, Frison L, Halperin JL, Lane DA
Cognicao 8 avaliaçãoões
10-CS
Apolinario D, Lichtenthaler DG, Magaldi RM, Soares AT, Busse AL, Amaral JRG, et al Using temporal orientation, category fluency, and word recall for detecting cognitive impairment: the 10-point cognitive screener (10-CS) Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2016; 31(1): 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4282 Aprahamian I, Suemoto CK, Aliberti MJR, Fortes-Filho SQ, Melo JA, Lin SM, et al Frailty and cognitive status evaluation can better predict mortality in older adults? Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2018; 77: 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.04.005 Fortes-Filho SQ, Apolinario D, Melo JA, Suzuki I, Sitta MC, Leme LEG Predicting delirium after hip fracture with a 2-min cognitive screen: prospective cohort study Age ageing 2006; 45(5): 713-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw084 Fortes-Filho SQ, Aliberti MJR, Melo JA, Apolinario D, Sitta MC, Suzuki I, et al A 2-minute Cognitive Screener for Predicting 1-Year Functional Recovery and Survival in Older Adults After Hip Fracture Repair
CDR
Chaves MLF, Camozzato AL, Godinho C, Kochhann R, Schuh A, Almeida VL et al Validity of the clinical dementia rating scale for the detection and staging of dementia in Brazilian patients Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2007; 21(3): 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e31811fff2b4 Cummings J, Hahn-Pedersen JH, Eichinger CS, Freeman C, Clark A, Tarazona LRS et al Exploring the relationship between patient-relevant outcomes and Alzheimer´s disease progression assessed using the clinical dementia rating scale: a systematic literature review Front Neurol 2023; 14:1208802. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1208802 Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia Br J Psychiatry 1982; 140: 566-72. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.140.6.566 Maia ALG, Godinho C, Ferreira ED, Almeida V, Schuh A, Kaye J et al
CDR Soma das Caixas
Berg L, Miller JP, Storandt M, Duchek J, Morris JC, Rubin EH et al Mild senile dementia of Alzheimer type: 2 Ann Neurol 1988; 23(5): 477-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410230509 Berg L, Miller JP, Baty J, Rubin EH, Morris JC, Figiel G Mild senile dementia of Alzheimer type. 4 Ann Neurol 1992; 31(3): 242-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410310303 Lima APV, Castilhos R, Chaves MLF The use of Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes Scores in detecting and staging cognitive impairment/dementia in brazilian patients with low educational attainment Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2017; 31(4): 322-327. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000205 Lynch CA, Walsh C, Blanco A, Moran M, Coen RF, Walsh JB et al
Escore de Hachinski
Dening TR, Berrios GE The Hachinski Ischaemic Score: A reevaluation Int J Geriatr Psychiatr 1992; 7(8): 585-589. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.930070808 Fischer P, Jellinger K, Gatterer G, Danielczyk W Prospective neuropathological validation of Hachinski’s Ischaemic Score in dementias J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54(7): 580-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.54.7.580 Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Du Boulay GH, McAllister VL, Marshall J, Russell RW, et al Cerebral Blood Flow in dementia Arch Neurol 1975; 32(9): 632-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1975.00490510088009 Diagnostic evaluation of degenerative and vascular dementia
FAST
Brucki SMD, Aprahamian I, Borelli WV, Silveira VC, Ferretti CEL, Smid J, et al. Manejo das demências em fase avançada: recomendações do Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento da Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. Dement Neuropsychol 2022; 16 (3 suppl. 1):101-120. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-S107PT Reisberg B, Ferris SH, Anand R, de Leon MJ, Schneck M, Buttinger C, et al. Functional staging of dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Ann NY Acad of Sci 1984; 435: 481-483. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb13859.x Reisberg B, Ferris SH, Franssen E. An ordinal functional assessment tool for Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1985. 36(6): 593-595. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.36.6.593 Sclan SG, Reisberg B. Functional assessment staging (FAST) in Alzheimer’s disease: reliability, validity, and ordinality. Int Psychogeriatr 1992; 4 Suppl 1: 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610292001157 ⚠ Limitação importante ve FAST 7: DA grave Ressalta-se que, mais importante do que avaliações e classificações pontuais, é a aplicação seriada do instrumento e o julgamento quanto a variações ao longo do tempo. * Salienta-se que os instrumentos de avaliação geriátrica devem ser utilizados em conjunto com anamnese e exame físico. Devendo ser ▼ Ver fontes e data de acesso Referências: Brucki SMD, Aprahamian I, Borelli WV, Silveira VC, Ferretti CEL, Smid J, et al Manejo das demências em fase avançada: recomendações do Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento da Academia Brasileira de Neurologia Dement Neuropsychol 2022; 16 (3 suppl. 1):101-120. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-S107PT Reisberg B, Ferris SH, Anand R, de Leon MJ, Schneck M, Buttinger C, et al Functional staging of dementia of the Alzheimer’s type Ann NY Acad of Sci 1984; 435: 481-483. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb13859.x Reisberg B, Ferris SH, Franssen E An ordinal functional assessment tool for Alzheimer’s-type dementia Hosp Community Psychiatry 1985. 36(6): 593-595. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.36.6.593 Sclan SG, Reisberg B Functional assessment staging (FAST) in Alzheimer’s disease: reliability, validity, and ordinality Int Psychogeriatr 1992; 4 Suppl 1: 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610292001157
Fluência Verbal Semântica
Aprahamian I, Martinelli JE, Cecato J, Yassuda MS Screening for Alzheimer's disease among illiterate elderly: accuracy analysis for multiple instruments J Alzheimers Dis 2011; 26(2):221-9. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2011-110125 Brucki SMD, Malheiros SMF, Okamoto IH, Bertolucci PHF Dados normativos para o teste de fluência verbal categoria animais em nosso meio Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1997; 55(1):56-61. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X1997000100009 Brucki SMD, Rocha MSG Category fluency test: effect of age, gender and education on total scores, clustering and switching in Brazilian Portuguese-speaking subjects Braz J Med Biol Res 2004; 37(12):1771-1777. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2004001200002 Caramelli P, Carthery-Goulart MT, Porto CS, Charchat-Fichman H, Nitrini R Category Fluency as a Screening Test for Alzheimer Disease in Illiterate and Literate Patients Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2007; 21(1):65-7. htt ps://doi.org/10.1097/wad.0b013e31802f244f de Paula JJ, Bertola L, Ávila RT, Moreira L, Coutinho G, de Moraes EN et al Clinical Applicability and Cutoff Values for an Unstructured Neuropsychological Assessment Protocol for Older Adults with Low Formal Education
Mini-Mental (MEEM)
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Teste do Relógio (TDR)
Aprahamian I.O teste do desenho do relógio no rastreio diagnóstico da doença de Alzheimer em idosos no Brasil.[dissertação] Campinas, SP: Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2008, 151 p. https://doi.org/10.47749/T/UNICAMP.2008.433981 Classificação das estratégias de construção do teste do desenho do relógio [dissertação] Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro; 2017, 103 p. http://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.51890 Mendez MF, Ala T, Underwood K Development of scoring citeria for the clock drawing task in Alzheimer’s disease J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:1095-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01796.x Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Porto CS, Charchat-Fichiman H, Formigoni AP, Carthery-Goulart MT et al Brief cognitive battery in the diagnosis of mild Alzheimer’s disease in subjects with medium and high level of education Dement Neuropsychol 2007; 1(1):32-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642008DN10100006 Shulman KI, Shedletsky R, Silver IL The challenge of time: click-drawing and cognitive function in the elderly Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1986;1:135-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.930010209 Spenciere B, Alves H, Charchat-F
Cuidados Paliativos 4 avaliaçãoões
ECOG
Oken MM, Creech RH, Tomey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982; 5(6): 649-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014 Péus D, Newcomb N, Hofer S. Appraisal of the Karnofsky Performance Status and proposal of a simple algorithmic system for its evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-72 . Scott JM, Stene G, Edvarsen E, Jones LW. Performance status in cancer: not broken, but time for an upgrade? J Clin Oncol 2020; 38(25): 2824-2829. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00721 . Sok M, Zavrl M, Greif B, Srpcic M. Objective assessment of WHO/ECOG performance status. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27(10): 3793-3798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4597-z . Taylor AE, Olver IN, Sivanthan T, Chi M, Purnell C. Observer error in grading performance status in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 1999; 7(5): 332-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005200050271 . West HJ, Jin JO. Performance Status in Patients with Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2015; 1(7): 998. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3113 . World Health Organization. WHO Handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva: WHO; 1979. 46p. Zubrod CG, Schneiderman M, Frei III E, Brindley C, Gold GL, Shnider B et al. Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: comparative therapeutical trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide. J Chronic Dis 1960; 11: 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(60)90137-5 ⚠ Limitação importante do abaixo. Contudo, não deve pode ser o fator único de decisão para a escolha terapêutica. ECOG 0 e 1 – Maior tendência à terapia curativa, em pacientes oncológicos; ECOG 2 ou mais – Maior tendência à terapia paliativa. Ressalta-se que, mais importante do que avaliações e classificações pontuais, é a aplicação seriada ▼ Ver fontes e data de acesso Referências: Oken MM, Creech RH, Tomey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET et al Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Am J Clin Oncol 1982; 5(6): 649-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014 Péus D, Newcomb N, Hofer S Appraisal of the Karnofsky Performance Status and proposal of a simple algorithmic system for its evaluation BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-72 Scott JM, Stene G, Edvarsen E, Jones LW Performance status in cancer: not broken, but time for an upgrade? J Clin Oncol 2020; 38(25): 2824-2829. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00721 Sok M, Zavrl M, Greif B, Srpcic M Objective assessment of WHO/ECOG performance status Support Care Cancer 2019; 27(10): 3793-3798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4597-z
ESAS-r
Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients J Palliat Care. 1991;7(2):6-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/082585979100700202 Hui D, Shamieh O, Paiva CE, Khamash O, Perez-Cruz PE, Kwon JH et al Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Physical, Emotional, and Total Symptom Distress Scores of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System J Pain Symptom Manage 2016; 51(2): 262-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.004 Hui D, Bruera E The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments J Pain Symptom Manage 2017; 53(3): 630-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.370 Monteiro DR, Kruse MHL, Almeida MA Avaliação do Instrumento Edmonton Symptom Assessment System em cuidados paliativos: revisão integrativa Rev Gaúcha Enferm 2010; 31(4): 785-93. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-14472010000400024 Monteiro DR, Almeida MA, Kruse MHL Tradução e Adaptação Transcultural do Instrumento Edmonton Symptom Assessment System para uso em Cuidados Paliativos
Escala de Karnofsky
Abernethy AP, Shelby-James T, Fazekas BS, Woods D, Currow DC. The Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) scale: a revised scale for contemporary palliative care clinical practice. BMC Palliat Care 2005; 4:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-684x-4-7 Crooks V, Waller S, Smith T, Hahn TJ. The use of the Karnofsky Performance Scale in determining outcomes and risk in geriatric outpatients. J Gerontol 1991; 46(4): M139-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/46.4.m139 . Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer, in Macleod CM: Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. New York, Columbia, University Press, 1949, p. 199-205. Péus D, Newcomb N, Hofer S. Appraisal of the Karnofsky Performance Status and proposal of a simple algorithmic system for its evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-72 . Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. Karnofsky Performance Status Revisited: reliability, validity and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2(3): 187-93. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1984.2.3.187 . Timmermann C. ‘Just give me the best quality of life questionnaire: the Karnofsky scale and the history of quality of life measurements in cancer trials. Chronic Illn 2013; 9(3): 179-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395312466903 . Yates JW, Chalmer B, McKegney FP. Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Karnofsky Performance Status. Cancer 1980; 45(8): 2220-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19800415)45:8<2220::aid-cncr2820450835>3.0.co;2-q ⚠ Limitação importante mado (acima de 50%) Ressalta-se que, mais importante do que avaliações e classificações pontuais, é a aplicação seriada do instrumento e o julgamento quanto a variações ao longo do tempo. * Salienta-se que os instrumentos de avaliação geriátrica devem ser utilizados em conjunto com anamnese e exame físico. Devendo ser ▼ Ver fontes e data de acesso Referências: Abernethy AP, Shelby-James T, Fazekas BS, Woods D, Currow DC The Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) scale: a revised scale for contemporary palliative care clinical practice BMC Palliat Care 2005; 4:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-684x-4-7 Crooks V, Waller S, Smith T, Hahn TJ The use of the Karnofsky Performance Scale in determining outcomes and risk in geriatric outpatients J Gerontol 1991; 46(4): M139-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/46.4.m139 The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer, in Macleod CM: Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents New York, Columbia, University Press, 1949, p. 199-205 Appraisal of the Karnofsky Performance Status and proposal of a simple algorithmic system for its evaluation BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-72 Karnofsky Performance Status Revisited: reliability, validity and guidelines
PCST-BR
Center to Advance Palliative Care. 2004 Crosswalk of JCAHO Standards and Palliative Care – with PC Policies, Procedures and Assessment tools; 2004. 66p Disponível em: https://www.palliativedrugs.org/download/JCAHO-crosswalk.pdf Clara MGS, Silva VR, Alves R, Coelho MCR Escala Palliative Care Screening Tool como instrumento para indicação de cuidados paliativos em idosos Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol 2019; 22(5): e190143. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562019022.190143 Dias PR, Delboni ACLS, Martins MM, Delboni VS, Alves EM Indicação de Cuidados Paliativos pela escala Palliative Care Screening Tool (PCST) – revisão de literatura Brazil J Develop 2022; 8(3): 16128-16137. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n3-041 Lucchetti G, Badan Neto AM, Ramos SAC, Faria LFC, Granero AL, Pires SL, et al Use of a palliative care screening tool in elderly from a nursing home Geriatr Gerontol Aging. 2009;3:104-108
Disfagia 1 avaliação
EAT-10
Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the Ea ▼ Ver fontes e data de acesso Referências: Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008. 117(12): 919-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940811701210 Gonçalves MIR, Remaili CB, Behlau M Equivalência cultural da versão brasileira do Eating Assessment Tool – EAT-10 CoDAS 2013; 25(6):601-4. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-17822013.05000012 Salvador LSA, Rodrigues TMP, Rocha IARS Instrumentos de avaliação da deglutição em adultos: revisão integrativa da literatura Rev Baiana Enferm 2024; 38: e57111. https://doi.org/10.18471/rbe.v38.57111 .
Disturbios Do Movimento 2 avaliaçãoões
Hoehn & Yahr
Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O et al. Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: status and recommendations. Mov Disord 2004; 19(9): 1020-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20213 Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 1967; 17(5): 427-42. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.17.5.427 Zhao YJ, Wee HL, Chan Y et al. Progression of Parkinson’s Disease as Evaluated by Hoehn and Yahr Stage Transition Times. Mov Disord 2010; 25(6): 710-716. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22875 ⚠ Limitação importante incapacidade grave Ressalta-se que, mais importante do que avaliações e classificações pontuais, é a aplicação seriada do instrumento e o julgamento quanto a variações ao longo do tempo. * Salienta-se que os instrumentos de avaliação geriátrica devem ser utilizados em conjunto com anamnese e exame físico. Devendo ser ▼ Ver fontes e data de acesso Referências: Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O et al Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: status and recommendations Mov Disord 2004; 19(9): 1020-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20213 Hoehn MM, Yahr MD Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality Neurology 1967; 17(5): 427-42. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.17.5.427 Zhao YJ, Wee HL, Chan Y et al Progression of Parkinson’s Disease as Evaluated by Hoehn and Yahr Stage Transition Times Mov Disord 2010; 25(6): 710-716. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22875
Pull Test
Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR et al Movement Disorder Society- sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results Mov Disord 2008; 23(15):2129-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22340 Hunt AL, Sethi KD Mov Disord 2006; 21(7):894-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20925 Munhoz RP, Li J-Y, Kurtinecz M et al Evaluation of the pull test technique in assessing postural instability in Parkinson’s disease Neurology 2004; 62(1):125-7. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.62.1.125 Munhoz RP, Teive HA Pull test performance and correlation with falls risk in Parkinson’s disease Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2014; 72(8):587-91. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282×20140082 Nonnekes J, Goselink R, Weerdesteyn V et al The retropulsion test: a good evaluation of postural instability in Parkinson’s disease? J Parkinsons Dis 2015; 5(1):43-7. https://doi.org/10.3233/jpd-140514
Dor 9 avaliaçãoões
Calculadora de Opioides
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
DN4
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Escala Numérica da Dor
Bjelkarøy MT, Benth JS, Simonsen TB, Siddiqui TG, Cheng S, Kristoffersen ES, et al. Measuring pain intensity in older adults. Can the visual analogue scale and the numerical rating scale be used interchangeably? Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2024; 130: 110925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110925 Hadjistavropoulos T, Herr K, Prkachin KM, Craig KD, Gibson SJ, Lukas A, et al. Pain assessment in elderly adults with dementia. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13(12): 1216-27. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70103-6. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 41(6): 1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.painsymman.2010.08.016. Nimmaanrat S, Thepsuwan A, Tipchatyotin S, Jensen MP. Measuring pain intensity in older patients: a comparison of five scales. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24(1): 556. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05127-6. Peters ML, Patjin J, Lamé I. Pain assessment in younger and older pain patients: psychometric properties and patient preference of five commonly used measured of pain intensity. Pain Med 2007; 8(7): 601-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00311.x. Wood BM, Nicholas MK, Blyth F, Ashgari A, Gibson S. Assessing pain in older people with persistent pain: the NRS is valid but only provides part of the picture. J Pain 2010; 11(12): 1259-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.025 ⚠ Limitação importante s pontos na escala. Ressalta-se que, mais importante do que avaliações e classificações pontuais, é a aplicação seriada do instrumento e o julgamento quanto a variações ao longo do tempo. * Salienta-se que os instrumentos de avaliação geriátrica devem ser utilizados em conjunto com anamnese e exame físico. Devendo ser ▼ Ver fontes e data de acesso Referências: Bjelkarøy MT, Benth JS, Simonsen TB, Siddiqui TG, Cheng S, Kristoffersen ES, et al Measuring pain intensity in older adults Can the visual analogue scale and the numerical rating scale be used interchangeably? Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2024; 130: 110925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110925 Hadjistavropoulos T, Herr K, Prkachin KM, Craig KD, Gibson SJ, Lukas A, et al Pain assessment in elderly adults with dementia Lancet Neurol 2014; 13(12): 1216-27. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70103-6 Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 41(6): 1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.painsymman.2010.08.016 Nimmaanrat S, Thepsuwan A, Tipchatyotin S, Jensen MP Measuring pain intensity in older patients: a comparison of five scales
Escala Verbal da Dor
Ciconelli RM. Tradução para o português e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida “Medical outcomes study 36-Item Short-form Health Survey (SF-36)”. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 1997. Hadjistavropoulos T, Herr K, Prkachin KM, Craig KD, Gibson SJ, Lukas A, et al. Pain assessment in elderly adults with dementia. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13(12): 1216-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70103-6 . Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 41(6): 1073-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016 Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria conjunta SAES/SAPS/SECTICS n. 01, de 22 de agosto de 2024. Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas para Dor Crônica. Nimmaanrat S, Thepsuwan A, Tipchatyotin S, Jensen MP. Measuring pain intensity in older patients: a comparison of five scales. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24(1): 556. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05127-6 . Peters ML, Patjin J, Lamé I. Pain assessment in younger and older pain patients: psychometric properties and patient preference of five commonly used measured of pain intensity. Pain Med 2007; 8(7): 601-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00311.x . ⚠ Limitação importante uadro do indivíduo. Ressalta-se que, mais importante do que avaliações e classificações pontuais, é a aplicação seriada do instrumento e o julgamento quanto a variações ao longo do tempo. * Salienta-se que os instrumentos de avaliação geriátrica devem ser utilizados em conjunto com anamnese e exame físico. Devendo ser ▼ Ver fontes e data de acesso Tradução para o português e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida “Medical outcomes study 36-Item Short-form Health Survey (SF-36)” São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 1997 Hadjistavropoulos T, Herr K, Prkachin KM, Craig KD, Gibson SJ, Lukas A, et al Pain assessment in elderly adults with dementia Lancet Neurol 2014; 13(12): 1216-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70103-6 Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 41(6): 1073-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016 Ministério da Saúde (BR) Portaria conjunta SAES/SAPS/SECTICS n. 01, de 22 de agosto de 2024 Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas para Dor Crônica
EVA
Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63 suppl 11: S240-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543 Heller GZ, Manuguerra M, Chow R How to analyse the visual analogue scale: myths, truths and clinical relevance Scand J Pain 2016; 13: 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012 Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain J Pain 2003; 4(7): 407-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8 Kim Y, Park J, Moon Y, Han S Assessment of pain in the elderly: a literature review Natl Med J India 2017; 30(4): 203-207. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-258x.218673 Nimmaanrat S, Thepsuwan A, Tipchatyotin S, Jensen MP Measuring pain intensity in older patients: a comparison of five scales
FPS-R
Bieri D, Reeve R, Champion GD. The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: Development, initial validation and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain, 1990;41:139-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(90)90018-9 Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford P. The Faces Pain Scale – Revised: Toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain 2001;93:173-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00314-1 Kang Y, Demiris G. Self-report pain assessment tools for cognitively intact older adults: Integrative review. Int J People Nurs 2018; 13(2):e12170. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12170 Silva FC, Thuler LCS. Tradução e adaptação transcultural de duas escalas para avaliação da dor em crianças e adolescentes. J Pediatr (Rio de Janeiro) 2008; 84(4): 344-49. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0021-75572008000400010 Stuppy DJ. The Faces Pain Scale: reliability and validity with mature adults. Appl Nurs Res 1998; 11(2): 84-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0897-1897(98)80229-2 Ware LJ, Epps CD, Herr K, Packard A. Evaluation of the Revised Faces Pain Scale, Verbal descriptor scale. numeric rating scale, and Iowa pain thermometer in older minority adults. Pain manag nurs 2006; 7(3): 117-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2006.06.005 ⚠ Limitação importante – 1 -2 – 3 – 4 – 5. Ressalta-se que, mais importante do que avaliações e classificações pontuais, é a aplicação seriada do instrumento e o julgamento quanto a variações ao longo do tempo. * Salienta-se que os instrumentos de avaliação geriátrica devem ser utilizados em conjunto com anamnese e exame físico. Devendo ser ▼ Ver fontes e data de acesso Referências: Bieri D, Reeve R, Champion GD The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: Development, initial validation and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties Pain, 1990;41:139-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(90)90018-9 Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford P The Faces Pain Scale – Revised: Toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement Pain 2001;93:173-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00314-1 Kang Y, Demiris G Self-report pain assessment tools for cognitively intact older adults: Integrative review Int J People Nurs 2018; 13(2):e12170. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12170 Silva FC, Thuler LCS Tradução e adaptação transcultural de duas escalas para avaliação da dor em crianças e adolescentes J Pediatr (Rio de Janeiro) 2008; 84(4): 344-49. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0021-75572008000400010 Stuppy DJ The Faces Pain Scale: reliability and validity with mature adults
Geriatric Pain Measure
Aguiar DS, Pinheiro IM Multidimensional instruments validated in Brazil for pain evaluation in the elderly: narrative review BrJP São Paulo 2019; 2(3): 289-92. https://doi.org/10.5935/2595-0118.20190051 Ferrell BA, Stein WM, Beck JC The Geriatric Pain Measure: validity, reliability, and factor analysis J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48(12): 1669-73 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03881.x Gambaro RC, Santos FC, Thé KB, Castro LA, Cendoroglo MS Avaliação de dor no idoso: proposta de adaptação do “Geriatric Pain Measure” para a língua portuguesa Rev Bras Med (Rio de Janeiro) 2009; 66(1): 62-5 Motta TS, Gambaro MC, Santos FC Pain measurement in the elderly: evaluation of psychometric properties of the Geriatric Pain Measure – Portuguese version Rev Dor São Paulo 2015; 16(2): 136-41. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-0013.20150026
PACSLAC
Chow S, Chow R, Lam M, Rowbottom L, Hollenberg D, Friesen E et al Pain assessment tools for older adults with dementia in long-term care facilities: a systematic review Neurodegener Dis Manag 2016; 6(6): 525-538. https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2016-0033 Coca SM, Zuñiga RAA Instruments for pain assessment in patients with advanced dementia: A systematic review of the evidence for Latin America Palliat Support Care 2020; 18(6): 741-747. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147895151900107x Fuchs-Lacelle S, Hadjistavropoulos T Development and preliminary validation of the pain assessment checklist for seniors with limited ability to communicate (PACSLAC) Pain Manag Nurs 2004; 5(1): 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2003.10.001 Lorenzet IC, Santos FC, Souza PM, Gambarro RC, Coelho S, Cendoroglo MS Avaliação da dor em idosos com demência: tradução e adaptação transcultural do instrumento PACSLAC para a língua portuguesa Rev Bras Med. 2011;68(4):129-33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335366051_Avaliacao_da_dor_em_idosos_com_demencia_traducao_e_adaptacao_transcultural_do_instrumento_PACSLAC_para_a_lingua_portuguesa_Assessment_of_pain_in_elderly_patients_with_dementia_translation_and_transcul Thé KB, Gazoni FM, Cherpak GL, Lorenzet IC, Santos LA, Nardes EM, et al Avaliação da dor em idosos dementados: validação da versão brasileira da escala PACSLAC
PAINAD
Dunford E, West E, Sampson EL Psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale in an acute general hospital setting Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2022; 37(12): 10.1002/gps.5830. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5830 Hadjistavropoulos T, Herr K, Prkachin KM, Craig KD, Gibson SJ, Lukas A, et al Pain assessment in elderly adults with dementia Lancet Neurol 2014; 13(12): 1216-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70103-6 Valera GG Tradução e adaptação cultural para o Brasil da escala “Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia – PAINAD”. [dissertação]: Universidade Federal de São Carlos; 2014. https://repositorio.ufscar.br/items/8625230c-b397-41e2-9419-55d1b4c93f45 Valera GG, Carezzato NL, Vale FAC, Hortense P Adaptação cultural para o Brasil da escala Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia – PAINAD Rev Esc Enferm USP 2014; 48(3): 462-8. https://www.scielo.br/j/reeusp/a/wFHCjTKbxcrn37Zpjmm5Kcn/?format=pdf⟨=pt Warden V, Hurley AC, Volicer L Development and psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003; 4(1): 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jam.0000043422.31640.f7
Fragilidade 3 avaliaçãoões
Escala Clínica de Fragilidade
Rockwood K, Stadnyk K, MacKnight C, et al. A brief clinical instrument to classify frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 1999; 353(9148):205-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04402-x Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050051 Rockwood K, Theou O. Using the Clinical Frailty Scale in Allocating Scarce Health Care Resources. Can Geriatr J. 2020;23(3):210-215. https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.23.463 Rodrigues MK, Rodrigues IN, da Silva DJVG, et al. Clinical Frailty Scale: Translation and Cultural Adaptation into the Brazilian Portuguese Language. J Frailty Aging 2021; 10(1): 38-43. https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2020.7 ⚠ Limitação importante 9: Doente terminal Ressalta-se que, mais importante do que avaliações e classificações pontuais, é a aplicação seriada do instrumento e o julgamento quanto a variações ao longo do tempo. * Salienta-se que os instrumentos de avaliação geriátrica devem ser utilizados em conjunto com anamnese e exame físico. Devendo ser ▼ Ver fontes e data de acesso Referências: Rockwood K, Stadnyk K, MacKnight C, et al A brief clinical instrument to classify frailty in elderly people Lancet. 1999; 353(9148):205-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04402-x Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C et al A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050051 Rockwood K, Theou O Using the Clinical Frailty Scale in Allocating Scarce Health Care Resources Can Geriatr J. 2020;23(3):210-215. https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.23.463 Rodrigues MK, Rodrigues IN, da Silva DJVG, et al Clinical Frailty Scale: Translation and Cultural Adaptation into the Brazilian Portuguese Language J Frailty Aging 2021; 10(1): 38-43. https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2020.7
Escala FRAIL
Aprahamian I, Cezar NOC, Izbicki R et al Screening for frailty with the FRAIL Scale: A comparison with the phenotype criteria J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017; 18(7):592-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.01.009 Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001; 56: 146–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146 Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging Sci World J 2001; 1: 323–36. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.58 van Kan GA, Rolland Y, Bergman H et al Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice J Nutr Health Aging 2008; 12 (1):29-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02982161 van Kan GA, Rolland YM, Morley JE et al Frailty: toward a clinical definition
VES-13
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Funcionalidade 6 avaliaçãoões
Lawton & Brody (7 itens)
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Lawton & Brody (8 itens)
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Lawton & Brody (9 itens)
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Pfeffer (FAQ)
Aprahamian I, Martinelli JE, Cecato J, Yassuda MS Screening for Alzheimer’s disease among illiterate elderly: accuracy analysis for multiple instruments J Alzheimers Dis 2011; 26(2):221-9. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2011-110125 Assis LO, Assis MG, Paula JJ, Malloy-Diniz LF O questionário de atividades funcionais de Pfeffer: Revisão integrativa da literatura brasileira Estud Interdiscipl envelhec 2015; 20(1):297-324. https://doi.org/10.22456/2316-2171.50189 Dutra MC, Ribeiro RS, Pinheiro SB, Melo GF, Carvalho GA Accuracy and reliability of the Pfeffer Questionnaire for the Brazilian elderly population Dement Neuropsychol 2015; 9(2): 176-83. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642015DN92000012 Jacinto AF Alterações cognitivas em pacientes idosos atendidos em ambulatório geral de clínica médica: Tese para obtenção do título de doutor em ciências São Paulo: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; 2008. https://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/5/5138/tde-12012009-172647/publico/Alessandrofjacinto.pdf Jacinto AF, Brucki SMD, Porto CS, Martins MA, Citero VA, Nitrini R Suggested instruments for General Practitioners in countries with low schooling to screen for cognitive impairment in the elderly
Índice de Barthel
Araujo EAT, Lima Filho BF, Silva ACMB, Melo MCS, Gazzola JM, Cavalcanti FAC A utilização do Índice de Barthel em idosos brasileiros: uma revisão de literatura Revista Kairós-Gerontologia 2020;23(2), 217-231. https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/kairos/article/view/50360 Mahoney FI, Barthel DW Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14258950/ Minosso JSM, Amendola F, Alvarenga MRM, Oliveira MAC Validação, no Brasil, do Índice de Barthel em idosos atendidos em ambulatórios Acta Paul Enferm 2010; 23(2): 218-23. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002010000200011 Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42(8): 703-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6 Vilela Jr GB, von Stockler S, Duvalier AM Avaliação e Validação da escala Barthel para a língua portuguesa falada no Brasil
Índice de Katz
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Humor 3 avaliaçãoões
Escala de Cornell
Alexopoulos GS, Abrams RC, Young RC, Shamoian CA Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia Biol Psychiatry 1988; 23(3): 271-84. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(88)90038-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(88)90038-8 Atchison KA, Nazir A, Wu P, Seitz D, Wat JA, Goodarzi Z Depression detection in dementia: A diagnostic accuracy systematic review and meta analysis update Health Sci Rep 2024; 7(11): e70058. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70058 Brown EL, Raue PJ, Halpert K Evidence-based Practice Guideline: Depression Detection in Older Adults With Dementia J Gerontol Nurs 2015; 41(11): 15-21. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20151015-03 Carthery-Goulart MT, Areza-Fegyveres R, Schultz RR, Okamoto I, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PHF et al Versão Brasileira da Escala Cornell de Depressão em Demência (Cornell Depression Scale in Dementia) Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2007; 65 (3-B): 912-915. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2007000500037 Goordazi ZS, Mele BS, Roberts DJ, Holroyd-Leduc J Depression case finding in individuals with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
GDS-15
Almeida OP, Almeida SA Confiabilidade da versão brasileira da escala de depressão em geriatria (GDS) versão reduzida Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1999; 57 (2-B): 421-426. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X1999000300013 Almeida OP, Almeida SA Short versions of the geriatric depression scale: a study of their validity for the diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1999. 14(10): 858-865. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199910)14:10%3C858::aid-gps35%3E3.0.co;2-8 Yesafage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M et al Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report J Psychiatr Res 1982; 17(1): 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 Yesafage JA, Sheikh JI. 9/Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and Development of a Shorter Version Clin Gerontol 1986; 5(1-2): 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1300/J018v05n01_09
PHQ-9
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Multimorbidade 2 avaliaçãoões
CIRS-G
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Índice de Charlson
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation J Chronic Dis 1987; 40(5): 373-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 Charlson ME, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J Validation of a combined comorbidity index J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47(11): 1245-51. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5 Charlson ME, Carrozzino D, Guidi J, Patierno C Charlson Comorbidity Index: A critical review of clinimetric properties Psychother Psychosom 2022; 91(1): 8-35. https://doi.org/10.1159/000521288
Nefrogeriatria 1 avaliação
Equações para Função Renal
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Nutricao 7 avaliaçãoões
Altura Estimada (Chumlea)
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Fórmula de Lorentz
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
GNRI
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
IMC
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
MAN
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
MAN-SF
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Área de Superfície Corporal
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Oncogeriatria 3 avaliaçãoões
CARG-TT
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
G8
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
mG8
Camara DB, Lima JTO, Bezerra MR, Sales DF, Cavalcanti ZR, Sales LT, et al Prognostic performance of the modified-G8 screening instrument for patients aged 60 years or older: A prospective cohort of 889 brazilian patients J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11(3): 533-535. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.10.021 Martinez-Tapia C, Canoui-Poitrine F, Bastuji-Garin S, Souberyan P, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Tournigand C, et al Optimizing the G8 Screening Tool for Older Patients With Cancer: Diagnostic Performance and Validation of a Six-Item Version Oncologist 2016; 21(2): 188-95. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0326 Martinez-Tapia C, Paillaud E, Liuu E, Tournigand C, Ibrahim R, Fossey-Diaz V, et al Prognostic value of the G8 and modified-G8 screening tools for multidimensional health problems in older patients with cancer Eur J Cancer 2017; 83: 211-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.027.
Quedas 4 avaliaçãoões
Escala de Berg
Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SLW, Williams JI, Gayton D Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument.Physiotherapy Canada 1989 41:6, 304-311 Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SLW, Williams JI, Maki B Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument Can J Public Health. 1992 Jul-Aug:83 Suppl 2:S7-11 Miyamoto ST, Lombardi Junior I, Berg KO, Ramos LR, Natour J Brazilian version of the Berg balance scale Braz J Med Biol Res [Internet]. 2004;37(9):1411–21. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2004000900017 Nackachima MA, Souza ML, Scheicher ME Determinação de valores de referência para os testes Escala de Equilíbrio de Berg e Velocidade de Marcha em idosos institucionalizados
SPPB
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
Teste Sentar e Levantar (30s)
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
TUG
Alexandre TS, Meira DM, Rico NC, Mizuta SK Accuracy of Timed Up and Go Test for screening risk of falls among community-dwelling elderly Braz J Phys Ther 2012; 16(5): 381-8. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000041 Andrade LCA, Costa GLA, Diogenes LGB, Pimentel PHR Timed Up and Go test na avaliação de risco de quedas em idosos: uma revisão de literatura Res, Societ, Develop 2021; 10(13):e321101321615 Barry E, Galvin R, Keogh C, Horgan F, Fahey T Is the Timed-up and Go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Geriatr 2014; 14: 1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-14 Reference values for the Timed-up and Go Test: A Descriptive Meta-Analysis
Sarcopenia 4 avaliaçãoões
Força de Preensão Palmar
Referência não extraída automaticamente do card. Revisar durante a curadoria bibliográfica.
SARC-Calf
Bahat G, Erdogan T, Ilhan B SARC-F and other screening tests for sarcopenia Curt Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2022; 25(1): 37-42 Barbosa-Silva TG, Bielemann RM, Gonzalez MC, Menezes AMB Prevalence of sarcopenia among community-dwelling elderly of a medium-sized South American city: results of the COMO VAI? Study J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2016; 7(2): 136-43. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12049 Barbosa-Silva TG, Menezes AMB, Bielemann RM, Malmstrom TK, Gonzalez MC Enhancing SARC-F: Improving Sarcopenia Screening in the Clinical Practice J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016; 17(12): 1135-1141. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.004 Chen L, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T, Chou M, Iijima K, et al
SARC-F
Bahat G, Erdogan T, Ilhan B SARC-F and other screening tests for sarcopenia Curt Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2022; 25(1): 37-42 Barbosa-Silva TG, Bielemann RM, Gonzalez MC, Menezes AMB Prevalence of sarcopenia among community-dwelling elderly of a medium-sized South American city: results of the COMO VAI? Study J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2016; 7(2): 136-43. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12049 Barbosa-Silva TG, Menezes AMB, Bielemann RM, Malmstrom TK, Gonzalez MC Enhancing SARC-F: Improving Sarcopenia Screening in the Clinical Practice J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016; 17(12): 1135-1141. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.004 Chen L, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T, Chou M, Iijima K, et al
Velocidade de Marcha
Bohannon RW, Andrews AW Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis Physiotherapy 2011; 97(3): 182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.004 Four-meter gait speed: normative values and reliability determined for adults participating in the NIH Toolbox study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 100(3): 509-513. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.031 Cruz-Jentoft A, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis Age Ageing 2019; 48(1): 16-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169 Lindemann U, Najafi B, Zijlstra W, Hauer K, Muche R, Becker C, et al Distance to achieve steady state walking speed in frail elderly persons
Sintomas urinários 1 avaliação
IPSS
Barry MJ, Fowler Jr FJ, O’Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK et al The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia J Urol 1992; 148(5): 1549-57. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36966-5 Berger M, Luz Jr PN, Silva Neto B, Koff WJ Validação estatística do escore internacional de sintomas prostáticos (I-PSS) na língua portuguesa J Bras Urol 1999; 25(2): 225 – 234 The influence of patient education level on the international prostatic symptom score J Urol 1995; 154(1): 97-9. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199507000-00034 Sandhu JS, Bixler BR, Dahm P, Goueli R, Kirkby E, Stoffel JT et al Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): AUA guideline amendment 2023